The funds for consistent returns – Update November 2024

The fund management industry promotes the idea of buying and holding actively managed funds for the long-term. Yet you are more likely to make more money by regularly reviewing your portfolio. In reality the reason why fund managers want you to stay invested with them is that it allows them to make more money from you via fund management charges.

However, I understand that there are times when you might not want to or can't switch your funds as often as you might want. For example, you may have a pension scheme that offers a limited choice of funds or restricts the number of switches you can perform. Or it may be that you like to have a core stable selection of funds in your portfolio around which you invest more actively in order to try to boost returns.

A number of years ago I carried out a piece of research aiming to identify funds for consistent returns. It focused on identifying funds that have consistently outperformed their peers over time, which aren't just focused on capital preservation. So I've gone back and refreshed the research as I do periodically.

Long-term outperformance screen

It's a fact that 90% of fund managers fail to beat the market over the long term which has been shown by numerous pieces of research. Yet there are a few that have. However, judging overperformance or underperformance based on an arbitrary time frame can give a skewed result.

So instead I decided to analyse the performance of every unit trust and investment trust out there (over 1,600 of them) versus each other over multiple time frames to produce a shortlist. I only shortlisted those funds that outperformed the average of their peer group (sector) over the following time periods:

• 1 year
• 3 years
• 5 years
• 10 years

Then to include an element of consistency the funds also had to show a similar level of outperformance in each of the last 5 years.

I also wanted to make sure that they were genuinely beating the market rather than simply doing better than their dud peers. So I also added a few screens which give an indication of fund manager skill. This would limit the likelihood that a fund manager had simply managed any outperformance by taking excessive risks in a rising market. These additional screens were namely:

Alpha

Alpha is a figure which measures a manager’s apparent skill at picking winning investments versus their benchmark. Alpha is the excess return versus the return of a fund’s benchmark (i.e the market). So a fund with a positive alpha indicates that the fund manager has outperformed through skill. While a negative alpha figure would indicate underperformance.

Sharpe ratio

The sharpe ratio is not a widely known statistic yet it indicates how much extra return a fund manager has achieved for the increased risk they have taken. There is nothing wrong with fund managers taking calculated investment risks if they result in additional returns for investors. So the higher a fund’s sharpe ratio the better.

Maximum Drawdown

Finally, I analysed how the funds had performed over the last 3 years and what the maximum fall during the period was for each fund. I then only included those with the lowest drawdowns versus their peers. 80-20 Investor tables include the drawdown figure (Max Fall) as it is useful but not published widely.

80-20 Investor algorithm screen

The above screening left just 8 funds (out of over 1,200 unit trusts and 450 investment trusts) which have shown a consistency of return over the medium to long-term (in various market conditions), yet doing so without taking unnecessary risk. The funds are shown below. Remember consistency, doesn't mean that the fund doesn't lose money in a market slump, but that it has shown a consistent level of outperformance versus its peers over time.

In this update of the most 'consistent funds' research, I have highlighted in blue those funds that retained their place in the list from the previous update in May 2024. Meanwhile those in green are in the current BOTB or BFBS tables. It's good to see Aviva Inv Global Equity Income, which I hold in my own £50k portfolio, making the cut.

Name	Sector	ISIN Code	1 month return %	3 month return %	6 month return %	Max weekly fall in the last 6 months	Ongoing Charge	Investment trust (discount /premium)
Jupiter Merian Asia Pacific	Asia Pacific Excluding Japan	GB00B1XG8C90	8.26	9.22	12.33	-4.56	1.25
Aviva Inv Global Equity Income	Global Equity Income	GB0030441918	2.45	4.01	7.87	-2.93	1.12
Invesco Global Emerging Markets (UK)	Global Emerging Markets	GB00B3RW7S64	5.07	5.55	8.57	-6.04	1.2
L&G International Index Trust	Global	GB00B2Q6HW61	3.95	3.41	8.57	-3.72	0.13
Fidelity Index US	North America	GB00BJS8SH10	5.23	4.8	11.73	-4.35	0.06
Royal London US Growth Trust	North America	GB0030038359	4.98	3.37	9.14	-5.34	1.03
JPM JPMorgan Global Growth & Income plc	Global Equity Income (Investment trusts)	GB00BYMKY695	6.25	2.98	6.87	-7.7	0.64	0.87
JPM JPMorgan American IT plc	North America (Investment trusts)	GB00BKZGVH64	4.08	2.08	5.34	-7.15	0.69	-4.41

 

The material in any email, the MonetotheMasses.com website, associated pages / channels / accounts and any other correspondence are for general information only and do not constitute investment, tax, legal or other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make (or refrain from making) any decisions. Always obtain independent, professional advice for your own particular situation. See full Terms & Conditions , Privacy Policy and Disclaimer.

Neither MoneytotheMasses.com/80-20 Investor nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Funds invest in shares, bonds, and other financial instruments and are by their nature speculative and can be volatile. You should never invest more than you can safely afford to lose. The value of your investment can go down as well as up so you may get back less than you originally invested.

Information provided by MoneytotheMasses.com/80-20 Investor is for general information only and not intended to be relied upon by readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions.

Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decisions. Leadenhall Learning (owner of MoneytotheMasses.com/80-20 Investor) and its staff do not accept liability for any loss suffered by readers as a result of any such decisions.

The tables and graphs are derived from data supplied by Trustnet. All rights Reserved.