What’s the highest charge you should pay for a fund?

7 min Read Published: 19 Jul 2017

Over the last couple of years I've explored the idea of fund costs and performance. The first piece of research I carried out was for the article 'Buy cheap, buy twice?'

In that particular research piece I looked at the UK All Companies sector and the performance of funds versus their annual charge (OCF) over numerous five year periods. In order to carry out the research I grouped the cost of funds within the largest unit trust sector (namely UK All Companies) into quartiles based on cost (from cheapest to most expensive). I then examined the average performance of each band over multiple five year periods.

The result was that there wasn't a direct relationship between cost and net performance (that's performance after charges). However there was an anomaly whereby funds with an OCF of around 1.22% fared worse while those nearer 1.6% fared best.

Full article available exclusively to 80-20 Investor members.

To read the complete article, sign up for a free trial or log in below.

MTTM AI (beta)
X
I’m MTTM AI (beta), powered by DaMoney. I can help with personal finance questions. I’m an AI tool, not a financial adviser. Answers are for information purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Always verify responses with your own research and seek professional advice. By using this chat, you agree to our Terms of Use.
Go ahead, ask me a question