Yesterday Santander launched a 'revolutionary' savings bond which promises to give investors interest upfront. With the promise of £1,000 of interest upfront (technically upfront means within six weeks of the initial deposit) for every £12,000 deposited it's grabbed the headlines. But look past the headlines and it soon becomes apparent that this nothing more than a poor savings rate, not a great one, with a gimmick to sell it.
So what is the deal?
- Customers receive £1,000 (net of basic rate tax) for every £12,000 they deposit. The £1,000 is theirs to do with as they please.
- This is equivalent to a 3.36% gross/AER fixed (Tip: remember AER stands for the Annual Equivalent Rate and shows what the interest rate would be if Santander paid interest and added it to the account each year)
- Minimum investment of £10,000
- Withdrawals or account closures will not be permitted during the fixed term period - which is 3 years.
- You have to open a Santander current account as well (unless you already have one) in order to receive your interest payment
Why is this not a great deal?
Well after looking around at other 3 year savings bond products you can immediately find a better rate. Both Clydesdale Bank and Yorkshire banks offer an equivalent rate of 4.3% with a minimum deposit of £2,000 on a 3 year savings bond.
What that means is that over the 3 year term a basic rate tax payer saving £12,000 into the new Santander product will receive a total of £13,000 (assuming they simply spent the £1,000 upfront interest rather than reinvest) while a Clydesdale saver will receive a total of £13,281. That's £281 difference.
But if the upfront interest attracts you why not simply put £11,000 into a Clydesdale bond and go on a shopping spree with the £1,000 you keep back. After the 3 year term is up a basic rate taxpayer would still receive back £12, 175 from Clydesdale. Still better than the Santander deal!!!
So it's just clever marketing?
Pretty much. Don't get me wrong I applaud the innovation from Santander, it's not the concept that's the problem - it's the interest rate. But having said that, teasing people with a promise of upfront interest seems like a ploy to boost the number of current account holders (as that's where the upfront interest must be paid).
I suppose it's a case of if it seems too good to be true it probably is.
But there are some people it may benefit - but only just
One quirk of receiving all your interest upfront is that it is taxable in the current tax year. So if you are a basic rate tax payer then you will receive the £1,000. But higher rate tax payers must pay additional tax via their tax return. Consequently if someone who currently a basic rate tax payer was due to become a 50% rate tax payer from next tax onwards (hardly likely admittedly) receiving all the interest upfront has obvious benefits. If they instead received interest monthly then once they became a 50%rate tax payer their interest payments would be liable to higher rate tax.
For example under this scenario someone would receive £13,000 after 3 years from a £12,000 investment in Santander Upfront Interest Bond but around £12,952 from either Clydesdale or Yorkshire bank. But even this extreme example hardly makes it worthwhile!
Looking for a financial adviser near you?
Do you need financial advice? An independent financial adviser can show you how to make the most
of your money. Find your nearest qualified and regulated adviser using this VouchedFor search tool.